MIT Study Confirms: Stuff Officially Always In the Last Place You Look

MIT Study Confirms: Stuff Officially Always In the Last Place You Look thumbnail
By
Published: September 11, 2009

CAMBRIDGE, MA – After more than a year of research, a team consisting of the most brilliant minds at MIT has finally closed the long-debated question of where stuff is when you lose it. “Everyone has always said it was in the last place they looked, but we wanted to turn this theory into a law.” says Dane Alder, the research team leader.

The project was fraught with hurdles, as the team had to determine the method by which they would conduct the research, and how to organize the data. Some wanted to use a pie chart, some wanted to use a bar graph, and yet a smaller group wanted to use a power point presentation. “What was really interesting,” reflects Alder, “is that stuff is either in the first place you look, or the last place. It is never in the middle.” Alder continued to explain that the first place often becomes the last place if the search is aborted, which occurs in 95% of all cases.

While the results of this study are truly groundbreaking, the research team is already looking to the next step. “What we need now to make these results meaningful,” says Alder, “is a way determine how to figure out what that last place is.” The group hopes to be able to develop a formula for pinpointing where the “last place” is, something a layperson would be able to use. “This is going to be even bigger than e=mc²,” he promises with a huge grin.

Preliminary research has given the team a start. Some of the more common last places have included: in the pocket of the jeans you wore last night, under the couch cushions, in the freezer, in the trash, and under the pile of dirty laundry. “This is a great start,” says Alder, “But we need a surefire method of figuring out where your specific last place is.”

Their efforts have garnered the attention of Apple CEO Steve Jobs, who recently announced plans to develop an iPhone application that will help you locate that “last place.” “There will be a recording of an angry person yelling ‘Where the fuck did I leave that stupid thing,’” explains Jobs, “to give the search a more realistic feel, and also to save you the energy of having to say it yourself.” Consumers will have the choice of either male or female voices, and be able to choose from over 100 languages.

“What MIT has done is really exciting,” proclaims Jobs. “This will result in a huge amount of saved time and energy for everyone, time that can be used playing Airigo or Pinball 360 on their iPhones.”

Alder and his team are hopeful that the collaboration with Apple will mean that a larger group of people will benefit from the study. “We are just trying to make the world a better place,” says Alder. “And I am just happy that we are going to be able to do it one last place at a time.”

  1. James says:

    Hilarious. Now if only I could find my iPhone…

  2. Ruben Dario says:

    I was completely bored and surfing the Internet for a good laugh. This was the last site I looked at before I logged off and I couldn’t stop laughing!!!!!! Damn those MIT guys.

  3. Mark LaFleur says:

    Awesome…I want more.

  4. reid says:

    brilliant .. i love it

  5. John says:

    And of course, I found this study in the last place I expected too.
    Thanks Alex for the great articles.

  6. Dave says:

    Does anyone know where the saying 'it's always in the last place you look' was first said by? Because it seems to me to be an aphorism. OF COURSE it is in the last place you look, for why would you look any other place for it once you have found it? It is funny because whatever you are looking for always seems to be in that place that you look last (after you have looked everywhere else). On a little reflection, one can see that this thing is only in the 'last place you looked' and 'after you have looked everywhere else' because you do not need to look anywhere else for it; it is OBVIOUS that it is not 'after you have looked everywhere else' because there are surely other places you could have looked (no matter how unlikely it is that that thing is there). Ergo, this study seems to be a waste of time!